Trusted Product Reviews For Consumer Electronics.

????????:???? ??????, ????? ???? ?? ????????? ???? (???? 1?? 6)

????? ???????: 5.4

?????????? ??????? ,?? hsam?? Orig? ???????? 1959???? ?? ????? “???????? LP ??????? ????????.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace

50 Responses to “????????:???? ??????, ????? ???? ?? ????????? ???? (???? 1?? 6)”

  1. doh1959 says:

    @Androly well theres a problem isnt there because the more we learn the closer science and the creation theory entwine why do you think the catholic church now embraces science

  2. JudistMarshalCrews says:

    if everything came from nothing who or what created nothing???

  3. imfreeinfinity says:

    UNTIL WE CREATE A WAY TO TIME TRAVEL THIS IS ALL JUST THEORY AND SPECULATION.

  4. mowgdog says:

    its in our nature to die out- we havnt done the earth any favours. the answer insnt in space or universe- its in our minds- through meditation and understanding our own life force…..THE TRUTH……in other words

  5. Multimorten says:

    @mowgdog well, i put it to you, if we don’t find the answer to these questions, intelligent life on earth, will eventually die out.

  6. mowgdog says:

    personally- i think some things, we as human beings- arnt supposed to know…..curiosity killed the cat .

  7. MueX says:

    @Androly How comically ironic your statement is, considering that the Big Bang theory was first proposed by a Roman Catholic Priest. Monsignor Georges LemaƮtre.

  8. bossadl1 says:

    @lezsmokehaze420 you jacked that theory from m-theory

  9. Record2894 says:

    @Androly

    pity. so you have a brain?
    dude, da vinci is so devoted in god and the bible
    and he knows that were going to have technology in the future`
    so youre saying da vinci doesnt use his brain in reading the bible ?

    now your brain is questionable.

  10. jsvramirez says:

    As humans we are drawn to simplicity, to simple answers. This is what belief is, a yearning for simple answers to complex problems. It is where religion starts. While it is arrogance to believe this universe was created just for us, it is also arrogance to believe that the machinations of our universe can be distilled into a few equations.

  11. MarkMaloney56 says:

    Dear Wonderers,
    My name is Mark Maloney; I would like to invite you to visit my website Epluribusunum56. com. There you will find entirely new physics and cosmology, called Proto-space and DSFF, which are the formational mechanics composing all aspects composing our universe. The best way to learn something new is to securitize it looking for errors. I welcome your opinions.
    Sincerely, Mark Maloney

  12. lezsmokehaze420 says:

    Were inside of an abstract bubble created from super massive bubbles colliding in a different dimention releasing energy in multiple dimentions including our own.I theorise if we could travel through dimentions and be able to view things it would look nothing like this universe and there would be giant amoeba looking structures rubbing against eachother creating new universes with no strain.I also think the time scale would be jurastically different.For instance 14bnyrs here is a halfsec. there.

  13. insideous57 says:

    @MarcusAurelianus I agree, it’s very arrogant to believe that we are so special, that this entire Universe was created just for us and that we are watched over by a superpowerful diety. How can we ever evolve further if we believe that our own delusions will protect us?

  14. illvato says:

    the only thing we can confirm in life is that we dont know shit=)

  15. yyyy2999 says:

    @zeppy215 maybe our universe is like bacteria, it separates, and there are many many universes like ours

  16. AugustusAurelianus1 says:

    @Androly – BRAVO! I am so delighted whenever I find like-minded individuals who do not adhere to hate-inspiring mythological beliefs, who are willing to proudly state their views in public, and who are willing to challenge the absurd & ridiculous views of those who are unfortunate to remain shackled to rituals & mores based upon ridiculous allegories depicted in ancient books of mythology, with exts written by primitive men and edited by hateful dogmatic medieval clerics…

  17. AugustusAurelianus1 says:

    @alhass2002kno – as for my reference to “accidental” as I believe in the Chaos theory, whereby literally everything that exists in ANY universe owes its existence to the accidental conversion of multiple elements at a given time & place which permitted its creation / formation. If a the asteroid which hit the Earth 65 billion years ago had not been following that particular route (or if the Earth weren’t at that segment of its orbit), the dinosaurs would have lived on) & we would not be here!

  18. AugustusAurelianus1 says:

    @alhass2002kno – while I would never presume to be a scientist, what they have established so far, for educated individuals with a relatively decent knowledge of Physics, chemistry & calculus, appear acceptable, given our current stage in development. What I deem ABSURD & unnacceptable (for me) is naming a mythological divinity as the creator of the universe! I view it far more acceptable to trust scientist of the early 21 century than ancient allegorical texts edited by biased Medieval clerics

  19. alhass2002kno says:

    @MarcusAurelianus Even cosmologists, scientists etc cannot even agree on how the universe was created. Their is no evidence to back up any of their controversial unproven theories or claims. Something cannot form out of nothing. It a very simple and basic concept. Plants, humans, animals etc are extremely complex entities and to say that they were ‘accidentally’ formed is absurd. It’s like saying an engine or a computer could have been ‘accidental’.

  20. MarcusAurelianus says:

    Outstanding documentary – Unfortunately mankind remains disturbed whenever new discoveries emerge to either dismiss + replace older concepts OR otherwise complement what was known before. Disturbing is the fact that primitive worshipers of divinities seem to cherish upon hearing that “everything we knew was wrong” AS IF the scientific world (along with the advanced individuals who detached themselves from mythological rituals were going to drop their knees & worship their divine beings…

  21. zeppy215 says:

    The flow could be a Blackhole in the Bulk or maybe our universe is separating & making a new universe from our’s? Like how a bubble can separate into two bubbles. Maybe a huge Blackhole on the other side of the universe?

  22. MarcusAurelianus says:

    @alhass2002kno @demvds @fabianoasc It amazes me that there remain people in the civilized word at our century making comments under a scientific documentary praising “divinities” & using absurd concepts as their arguments. Unaware of the hellish place the Earth was 1-2 billion years ago, when night & day did not occur as now (for the Earth revolved much faster, and it has been slowing down since the moon was formed. 4.4 billion years ago. YES, all the exists, including life is an accident

  23. imperativeduty says:

    @demvids Man may call god by different names but there is only 1

  24. BigMTBrain says:

    @Ehsona – Agreed! The harsh reality is that expensive programs with high production value must be made for the general public for widest possible viewership and relative commercial success. It takes a while for “new” science to bubble up in the popular press. So, by the time such shows are produced, those of us with enough thirst for cutting edge science have already researched and imagined beyond what is presented in such shows. For fresh reads, I recommend ScienceDaily and PhysOrg [dot] com.

  25. GBJ83 says:

    @demvids I did. Submit all the females in your family to your God. Ill be waiting, you shall be rewarded with heavenly glory.

  26. crooner2007 says:

    @MrBowsmith You are most welcome!

  27. MrBowsmith says:

    I appreciate the care you have taken in the uploading. superb, thanks.

  28. crooner2007 says:

    @noasthings John Coltrane appears on minute 3:25. The sound of the tenor sax is more full bodied. He’s on the left channel of the stereo mix.

    Cannonball solos at minute 5:13 and appears on the right channel.

    Hope this helps!

  29. noasthings says:

    Does anybody know what time Cannonball Adderley and John Coltrane play? I still can’t distinguish the altosax from a tenor >.<

  30. hapzap13 says:

    Cool !

  31. HarlemIXQuintin says:

    @amigodasophia

    The word ‘blue’ in this context is a play-on-words from ‘blues’ which was a mellow genre of music. If you say somebody is ‘blue’ it usually refers to them being depressed, and ‘blues’ music usually featured lyrics about discrimination against black Americans in the early part of the 20th Century. The genre was a big influence on Jazz and Miles Davis.

  32. FunkLevel69 says:

    c’est une des 7 merveilles du monde ce Miles Davis :)

  33. ALX2010777 says:

    excelente el sonido da la MC…..analogo lo mejor para el oido….. Gracias este tema esta en mis favoritos… quiero comprar este LP.

  34. archdeaconj says:

    Some once said…I can’t quote this verbatim but it’s near enough: ‘Most jazz musicians play like they’re grasping a glass of whisky, Miles plays like he’s stroking a Ming vase’. Can anyone give me the exact quote and / or tell me who said it. How true, by the way.

  35. roanoke703 says:

    I had never heard of this untl tonight after I had purchased a couple of jazz CD compliations. A friend who was with me told me about KIND OF BLUE and said I HAD to get/hear the original. It is very nice (from what I hear here). Thanks

  36. crooner2007 says:

    And the original issue was a quarter tone sharp.

  37. crooner2007 says:

    Yes it is. All CD versions starting with the 1992 Mastersound edition are in the correct speed. The recent Classic records LP reissues are also correct.

  38. kwakky says:

    Is this the version that’s off pitch? The liner notes to the CD issue say that the vinyl edition was too fast or too slow, i can’t remember.

  39. mrkodster says:

    Thank you!

  40. 19Spencer80 says:

    Thank you very much. I’m in luck then.

  41. crooner2007 says:

    They should have the deep groove on the record label and the dead wax should read 1A, 1B, 1C, 1AB, etc. 1A’s could be expensive.

  42. 19Spencer80 says:

    Great. Now Ive got a question. I also have the 6 eye Davis…have a couple of them. How do I know if they’re first pressings??? I have trouble knowing. Could you help me please.

  43. crooner2007 says:

    It’s a little bit of both. But I’m sure Miles wanted the mood of the album to evoke the traditional Blues form. Blues is an important influence in Jazz.

  44. amigodasophia says:

    Hi crooner2007, my name is Raphael, and I’m Brazilian. First, this album is pretty amazing. Thanks for putting the original LP. Second, I’d like to know from you if the word “blue” is a slang in the context of the album title or it is just the color itself.

    Thank u

  45. heymama1 says:

    Amazing tune. Captures you. No matter what kind of music you dig.

  46. crooner2007 says:

    Baby, you and I are INVINCIBLE. Infinite kisses to you!!!

  47. ModestMom2009 says:

    L o v e t h i s ! Babe—c o o l ~* Kiss me–

  48. Mawerick77 says:

    Pure enjoyment, even through computer speakers.

  49. grgtompen says:

    I disagree. This music is the ETERNAL LIFE.

  50. JohnFordDanceTroupe says:

    I love this version.

Leave a Reply

Security Code:

Powered by Wordpress | Designed by Elegant Themes

Powered by Yahoo! Answers

Powered by Yahoo! Answers